If I could vote, and if my vote were to go to the person who came up with the best line in tonight’s debate, then I would vote for CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. Here’s why:

Wolf Blitzer: “Senator Clinton, so do you say you were naive, and trusting President Bush about Iraq?”

Not to be outdone, Senator Obama chips in (after Hillary blushes her way through an evasive, unintelligible answer):

Obama: “A lot of what Senator Clinton has said on her campaign points to one thing: that she has the experience to lead from day one. I am saying, it is more important to be right on day one!

 

Excerpt from a conversation with a friend…

I: So you say you’re supporting Mrs. Clinton?

He: Yes. Just moral support. No financial support.

I: That sounds appropriate. They seem to have lots of money. Just lacking in morals.

Jan 282008
 

Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama has rubbed some women the wrong way. One women’s group has rather senselessly slammed the Massachusetts Senator of being a chauvinist, for he does not want to see a woman become President. How utterly stupid!

Over the past week, especially after Bill Clinton’s negative campaign, the race for the Democratic nomination has been turned from being one involving two candidates, one of whom happens to be a woman, and the other an African-American to one that is now an ugly battle fought virtually on gender and racial lines. And Senator Obama did not start this. Nor is he even interested in the race continuing in this fashion.

If someone asked me one reason why I would not want to see Hillary Clinton as the next President, this is my answer: in playing politics, this woman is going to be just an extension of Dubya. At least, the latter is likeable!

Jan 272008
 

For the past few days, I have been trying to recall a poem I read ten years ago (in my 9th standard Tamil textbook). It was one of my favorite poems, but I had trouble recollecting it. I don’t even know why I was thinking about it. Yesterday, though, I was able to recall it, while brushing my teeth (yes, I do that too!). I guess Mrs. Rajalakshmi, who was my Tamil teacher back then, would be proud if she comes to know I still am able recall this and quite a few other poems she taught us.

Here is the poem in question. I ask the reader to excuse spelling mistakes and adi pizhaigal, if any. I have also offered an explanation of the poem.

மைப்படிந்த கண்ணாளும் தானும்
கச்சி மயானத்தான் வார்சடையான்
என்னினல்லான் ஒப்புடையனல்லன்
ஒருவனல்லன் ஓரூரனல்லன் ஓருவமனில்லி
அப்படியும் அந்நிறமும் அவ்வண்ணமும்
அவனருளே கண்ணாகக் காணினல்லால்
இப்படியன் இந்நிறத்தன் இவ்வண்ணத்தன்
இவனிறைவன் என்றெழுதிக்காட்டொணாதே

This poem was written by Saint Thirunaavukkarasar (also known as Appar), one of the celebrated four out of the 63 naayanmaargal. The context is as follows. Someone asks Appar to describe the physical attributes of Lord Shiva, because he has heard that Appar had seen Lord Shiva.

Appar responds to this query, in the poem, by saying that Lord Shiva and His consort, Parvati (who is described with an excellent choice of words, maip padindha kaNNaaL) reside in Kanchipuram. Shiva has long hair. He is incomparable; He takes many forms; He is omnipresent; He cannot be described by mere words and allusions (Or uvaman illi; uvamai = simile).

He then says that instead of focusing on the details of Lord Shiva’s physical features, men should meditate on His infinite grace. It is simply a waste of time to for him, Appar, to describe that Lord Shiva is in this form, is of this colour and has these physical characteristics.

 

The Bush administration is intent on pushing the economic stimulus plan to provide Americans some relief from the credit crisis, and also wean the economy away from a probable recession. According to the plan, taxpayers will receive a check for $600, and those not paying taxes will receive a check for $300.

In the heat of the primaries season, and possibly also due to the uncertain nature of the global economic situation, this plan has not had its fair share of debate airtime. While there are many who are sceptical of a seemingly hurriedly thought out package, they remain muted because really no one knows what will resurrect the economy.

I have two questions myself concerning the plan. First, and to me, the most important question is will I, a taxpaying non-resident alien, who has been in the US only a few months, also receive a 600-dollar check? If yes, I would greatly welcome the plan.

The other question is, what is the guarantee that people would not tuck this money away into the safe confines of their bank accounts, rather than spend it immediately, thus boosting “consumer spending”, which is what the architects of the plan envisage?

If the prevailing logic, that consumer spending went down in the past month because people cut down on their expenses because they were uncertain about the future of the economy, is true, then one really needs to call into question the presumption that a one-time gift of 600 quids would spur people to lavish themselves with purchases.

P.S.: That said, I am unsure myself how else this could have been done better. To ensure that people do spend the money, the money could have doled out in the form of store credits. But that would only heighten criticism of the Bush administration that it is after all only pro-big business.

 

Gabby Logan eulogizes Sir Alex Ferguson in this article in The Times, drawing our attention to the fact that the Scot has, over the years, transformed himself into an elderly statesman of the English Premier League, a voice of reason that the footballing fraternity would miss once he eventually chooses to retire.

In his 22 years in charge of United, Ferguson has evolved into the elder statesman of the top flight; a kind of self-appointed union leader, or, for the more romantic among us, a Gandalf figure, willing to stick his head above the parapet and say when all is not well in the world (or Middle-earth).

Time and reputation have earned him that right and his inherent sense of right and wrong makes him a natural in the role. You get the feeling that, even as a little boy, Ferguson knew what he stood for. In acknowledging that he and Arsène Wenger, the Arsenal manager, have had great support from their chairmen and boards, the Scot was taking a swipe at the running of Liverpool and not at the fans, players or manager. I imagine it will win him some friends at Anfield, temporarily at least.

 

I must concede that every time there is a debate among the Democrats, Senator Obama comes up with the choicest of quotes to put Senator Clinton in her place. So much so that someone can actually come up with a book based just on his campaign speeches and debate performances, and call it The Quotable Obama.

Sample one from last night, when the senator from Illinois so succinctly slammed Bill Clinton for the negative campaign that he has been running against him.

CLINTON: Now, I just — I just want to be clear about this. In an editorial board with the Reno newspaper, you said two different things, because I have read the transcript. You talked about Ronald Reagan being a transformative political leader. I did not mention his name.

OBAMA: Your husband did.

CLINTON: Well, I’m here. He’s not. And…

OBAMA: OK. Well, I can’t tell who I’m running against sometimes.

 

Yes, that is the sample space. And here is the derivation*.

600000 x 0.5 x (4 / 60) x 0.4 x 0.5

*Various other factors tend only to lower this number, not increase it.

 

… is the kind of movie that you should not watch even if someone gave you 100 million dollars, because you would not live to enjoy the money.

 

The Hindu reports that the BJP has downplayed Narendra Modi’s visit to Chennai to luncheon with his “friend” Jayalalithaa. State BJP president has said…

“Our aim is to get the maximum number of MPs from Tamil Nadu, who will be supporting L K Advani as the Prime Ministerial candidate. We are not averse to alliance with any party, barring the Congress, Left and DMK for the next Lok Sabha polls.”

So how many other parties are there in Tamil Nadu, one wonders…

 

வகுத்தான் வகுத்த வகையல்லால் கோடி
தொகுத்தார்க்கும் துய்த்தல் அரிது

Even those who gather together millions will only enjoy them as it has been determined by the disposer (of all things).

(Thirukkural; Oozh; 377)

 

Very interesting article from the National Review Online, detailing the dynamics of a caucus and how one single vote by a young female voter helped Edwards best Clinton. Very good read.

 

… looked downcast after her unexpected third-place finish in Iowa last night. Almost as if she would have cried if she were not in front of a crowd. And when she delivered her concession speech, it seemed as if she did not want to be there at all, as if she were saying “No, I don’t want to do this. Someone just get me out of here.” Experience, maybe. Emotional stability?

 

Mritiunjoy Mohanty, Assistant Professor at IIM Calcutta, writes in Rediff in an article entitled “Why criticising the Rs 1-lakh car is wrong“.

Whereas the author (selectively) makes a case for car from the economic and energy pespectives, he does not at all address the issue of India’s urban infrastructure, or the lack of it. Cars, as we all know, are owned by people who think they can afford them, and need fuel to operate. But they run on roads. And pray someone tell me which Indian city has the roads to withstand an explosion in four-wheeled vehicles.

As someone who has used Chennai’s roads for almost 7 years, years that coincided with Chennai’s IT boom, I can vouch that by 2005 the city’s roads were choking. Fat paychecks and friendly loans had loosened the purse strings of conservative Chennai, and the result was obvious on the roads. While I do not have the necessary data to back my assertion, anyone who has been in Chennai would know this to be true. The same can be said of Bangalore too; my friends from Bangalore would agree that their situation is worse.

Transport statistics for Chennai city on March 31, 2002 reveals that the city has about 2700 kilometres of road. Non-commercial motor cars on the same date in the city number 325000. One would not be wrong in assuming that the numbers today would reveal that the number of motor cars has gone up by a much higher percentage than the length of roads.

Throw in a 1-lakh rupee car into this equation. Welcome as it is for people who were unable to afford a car till now, it skews the balance even further. Not only does it mean cars for those who did not have one, it will also be ideal for families thinking about a second or a third car. Basically therefore, in the next few years, we will have twice as many cars on just the same length of roads. (To say nothing of the poor driving skills of these new car owners.)

In city after city whose roads are already at or beyond the limit, a more affordable car is not, as Mr. Mohanty thinks, a disruptive innovation. Whereas one cannot stop Tata Motors from selling a car, and one cannot stop people from buying it, one can only hope that it will at least bring about a retroactive thrust into urban infrastructure development projects. Not an elitist gag that labels all criticism as wrong.

Update: The car has been unveiled, and it is called the Tata Nano.

© 2011 VKpedia Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha