Ending days weeks of silence, the UPA’s ninth-choice candidate for President, Mrs. Pratibha Patil has revealed in Chennai today that she has nothing to do with the allegations levelled against her. This ends weeks of speculation and doubts on her faculty of speech. During such time, the only other statement ascribed to her by the press was “Why would I be a rubberstamp President? I wasn’t a rubberstamp Governor.”
One wonders why Mrs. Patil, who has variously been described as brave, courageous et al chose not to make this statement earlier. Probably she has been tutored only today. To save her face and theirs, the UPA had to appoint two spokespersons exclusively to protect their brave and courageous ninth-choice candidate. This after she made some silly comment about the burqa.
Do not miscontrue Mrs. Patil’s silence, my dear reader, as a sign of her strength. If she were right, she must have answered the allegations levelled against her. Any self-respecting person would have done that. Whether they were true or not, baseless or not, an answer from her would have won her the trust of the millions she is going to be the leader of. Why hide behind the wall and be comfortably shielded by Cabinet ministers?
A few days ago, The Hindu stooped so low to publish the following on the front page, with the obvious intent of maligning the incumbent President…
It was neither a Rashtrapati Bhavan communiqué nor an official, signed press statement by the President’s spokesman — the only two ways the President lets his views and thinking be known. But on Wednesday, the Rashtrapati Bhavan experimented with a different format — an oral statement, conveying A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s willingness to enter the presidential fray.
A new and clever format, that permits the option of denial at a later stage.
I ask The Hindu, “Why don’t you ask the same of Mrs. Patil?” If the President can be ridiculed for not following protocol, then surely a Presidential contender must be expected to use a better mode of communication that rely on others to tell the world that she is clean.
The grade regurgiator
A few days ago, Rediff had published a head-to-head comparing the two main Presidential contenders – Mrs. Patil and Mr. Shekhawat. It made interesting read, and more importantly, brought back some old memories.
Back when we were in college, and preparing to write our SoP (statement of purpose) for grad school, we were advised to read a rather informative document by Dr. Mor Harchol-Balter of the School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon. In it, she talks about a particular kind of student, who fills his SoP with statements like, “I stood first in class in high school. Then I received a perfect score in my college entrance exams. During my four years in college, my GPA has never gone below 3.95…” Though obviously from a bright student, such an SoP won’t impress a grad school admissions committee, opines Dr. Harchol-Balter. This is because this student, the grade regurgitator, while listing the honours he has won or been conferred with, misses the objective of the essay.
Precisely that is what strikes me when I read about Mrs. Pratibha Patil. Yes, she has been Minister for this, and Minister for that, Lok Sabha MP, PCC Chief, Governor. But she is from the Congress Party, and anybody could have been all that by simply staying close to the first family of the Congress. Okay, maybe the writer of the Rediff.com article might not have highlighted Mrs. Patil’s other achievements on purpose. But really, other than passing mentions of hospitals and charities run by her, no one seems to find anything worthwhile with which to fill her CV.
In essence, it looks like we have to gear up not for our first woman President, but a benificiary of tokenism, opportunism and nepotism.
Related posts:
- If…… knowledge of the economy, and proven executive experience are the parameters on which the Presidential race were decided, maybe...
- Check out the new Google TalkGoogle Talk is my favourite IM. Despite being not as feature-rich as its counterparts from Yahoo! and MSN are, Google...
- IIPM’s statement?PressTalk has published a statement which, they claim, has been doing the rounds for the past few hours as IIPM’s...
- When the Chairman replied…[Of the dozens of forwarded mails I get, this is something which made sense] It seems that the story of...
- தலைவர் for PresidentNow that anyone can announce a Presidential candidate without consulting the candidate himself, here is my choice… SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Oh,...
Anthony Baines on 
July 2nd, 2007 at 7:40 pm
It is an open secret that “The Hindu” is pro-UPA, pro-DMK. The journalistic(are they?) pieces by Mr Harish Khare and the editorials of Mr N Ram are perfect examples of this.
July 4th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
I dunno what else one should expect from a Presendential candidate. The President is not selected by a Grad school admission committee for sure, to make it necessary for her CV to be more “imaginative”. She was the youngest MLA elected and she has never lost a single election till 1985, after which she was elected to Rajya Sabha, and became the governor in 2004, things that are definitely more than ‘worthwile acheivements’ for any woman in this country. Perhaps, some ppl would hav been more comfortable with a Page 3 diva as a Presedential candidate, whose charities and hospitals would have been more than a “passing mention”. You should have read more about the woman welfare organisations, charities etc that she has set up and the extra curricular activities she was involved during her college days before comin up with this.
Perhaps it would make more sense to me if you listed out the kind of qualities and acheivements that you think a Pres candidate should have.
July 6th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Ashok, the point is not whether she has achieved enough or not. The primary concern is her ability to stand up for herself.
I think you’re being simplistic on the “Page 3 diva” point. Dr. Kalam was not Page 3 before he came to occupy Rashtrapati Bhavan. And yet, he had near unanimous backing, and the support of the common man.
Even as to her achievements, everywhere we are only told she held this ministry or that, and not what she accomplished with her power (other than swindle unsuspecting villagers, and shield relatives from murder trials).