India are chasing 499 for victory. We have two days to get there, to rewrite Test history. But one man can write a script totally unexpected – Rahul Dravid.

At stumps on day 3, Dravid was batting on 3 off 30 deliveries, a scoring rate well above that in the previous inning, where he managed to bore everyone (including his own self, possibly) by helping himself to 5 runs off 66 deliveries. At a strike rate of 1 from 12 deliveries, Dravid is probably aiming to bat out the next 180 overs and guide India to an unexpected draw.

But no, this is not about statistics.

India’s scoring rate shows, nay, exposes our lack of confidence in taking on the Aussies. We are giving the likes of Mitchell Johnson and Brad Hogg much more respect than their bowling deserves. On the contrary, the Aussies approach every Test match as if it were a one-day contest. They strive to maintain a run rate of around 4, which requires them to be aggressive. This pushes the opposition on to the back foot, and secondly gives the Aussies fighting totals quick, which lends their bowlers a platform to work with.

Over the past few years, the Australians have used this aggression-submission technique to transform cricket into a different kind of sport. Technique and artistry, once the hallmarks of the “gentleman’s game”, have been replaced by improvisation and brute force. Which also explains why we prefer watching MS Dhoni to VVS Laxman. And as sport is a result-oriented business, winning is everything.

The Indian cricket team might be World Twenty20 champions. But if we are to seriously challenge Australia in the other forms of the sport, submissive cricket is not going to get us anywhere. While blooding the team with youngsters is important, it is more important to infuse in them more aggression and killer instinct that has made the formidable Aussies the team to beat.

 

Comment from the Metro’s Philadelphia edition last week:

The Philadelphia International Airport has been voted as the nation’s Best Airport to meet someone: Yes, of course. If you are delayed habitually for 6 hours, then it is surely the best place to meet someone!

 

… look the best team currently, most likely to win the League this year. Of course, Manchester United will win it nevertheless.

 

That the movie Malaikkottai be renamed “Kaadhile Poo”.

Dec 142007
 

Barack Obama came up with probably the best comeback line of the 2008 Elections so far in last night’s Democratic debate. In doing so, he gave Hillary Clinton a superb nose cut. Here is what happened:

Moderator: Senator Obama, you have Bill Clinton’s former national security adviser, State Department policy director and Navy Secretary, among others, advising you. With relatively little foreign policy experience of your own, how will you rely on so many Clinton advisers and still deliver the kind of break from the past that you’re promising voters?

(the audience breaks into a grin, and Hillary Clinton laughs monstrously)

Obama: Well…

Clinton: I want to hear that…

Obama: Well, Hillary, I’m looking forward to you advising me, as well. I want to gather up talent from everywhere.

(All-round applause… Clinton smirks uncomfortably at her blonde moment.)

That, in effect, sums up the difference between Obama and Clinton. Clinton’s strength might lie in her experience, but the fact that she absolutely lacks spontaneity (you bet she never could have come up with a comeback line half as good) has been one of the reasons for her recent downfall. In a race where personality is important, Clinton’s rehearsed “When I’ll be President…” lines sound jarring after the first few times, and loses out to Obama’s vivacity and enterprise.

 

1. Vel: Above-average masala flick, evidently designed to please as many sections of the audience as possible in over 2 hours. Excellent performance by Surya, in his first (?) double role, that puts to shame Vijay’s ATM. No doubt Vel is rocking the BO this Deepavali. Despite the music being a let-down, the movie is well-packaged overall.

2. Pollaadhavan: Dhanush revels again in a Pudhupettai-type role. Newbie director Vetri Maaran presents a riveting, compelling watch. The best of the Deepavali releases, this slick movie is also probably the best movie of the second half of 2007. Needless songs prove a distraction, while the comedy track (especially Santhanam) adds to the entertainment. Apart from Dhanush, the guy portraying Selvam the don is very convincing. Totally recommended!

3. Kannaamoochi Yenada: Okayish. A time-pass movie shot to help graduate students kill time over the winter break. Predictable at times. Prithviraj acquits himself rather well; Sandhya turns in an at-par performance, while Sathyaraj does not quite match the elan that Prakash Raj carries in these roles.

4. M: I am considering buying land some twenty miles from Chennai to build a temple for Fritz Lang. A thriller, the obvious comparison is with Hitchcock’s Psycho. However, the latter has to resort to darkness, rain, a haunted house and a killer speaking in monotone to frighten you, whereas Lang accomplishes all this just by showing a mother waiting for her child to return home after school, and a whistling man buying the kid a ball. A 1931 movie far ahead of its time.

5. Ammuvaagiya Naan: When I read in The Hindu that this movie had been selected ahead of Mozhi and Paruthi Veeran, I was surprised. Though not of the same calibre, this is still a very good movie. The debutante actress is impressive. Recommended, if you like slow movies.

6. Algiers: Interesting pre-war tale of how a jewel thief wanted across Europe is safe and at home in Algiers, until he meets a charming Parisian (Hedy Lamarr) who reminds him of what he misses.

7. It Happened One Night: So used are we to cliched romantic comedies and the elements that repeat in each that we won’t see anything special in this movie… that is, until we realise this was the one that started it all. Clark Gable is at his dashing best in his attempts to tame a shrew played by Claudette Colbert.

8. Rashomon: Poetry through images. Akiro Kurosawa’s temple will be built too.

 

நீ பார்த்த பார்வைகள் கனவோடு போகும்
நீ சொன்ன வார்த்தைகள் காற்றோடு போகும்
ஊர் பார்த்த உண்மைகள் உனக்காக வாழும்
உணராமல் போவோர்க்கு உதவாமல் போகும்.

 

Surya, the next superstar

It is very clear – Surya currently leads the race to become the next superstar of Tamil cinema. One can arrive at no other conclusion after watching Vel.

Surya’s introduction scene in the movie is cliched – and he uses even more cliches when he talks about how to hold the aruvaal. But once the dust settles, his acting talent reveals itself, and so is his ability to win over every section of the audience.

Contrast this with Azhagiya Thamizhmagan, another double-action movie, with its hero supposedly the superstar-in-waiting. The latter is okayish and watchable. I had written earlier that I found myself liking ATM. I stand by it, but had I watched Vel earlier, I wouldn’t have been as charitable.

Watching Surya in action exposes Vijay’s shortcomings. Even I am surprised when I write that Vijay’s dialogue delivery is one of his weaknesses. No; not when he is spewing out fiery rhetoric. But when he plays the normal lover-boy type scenes, he is needlessly speaking nuni-naakku type Tanglish. And when he is angry, his dialogues sound as if uttered with the teeth gnawing against each other. These are unnatural, and when observed more than once, it makes one wonder if the actor is operating with a limited repertoire. And because Vijay is not of a broad build, he won’t have someone like Abbas remark “Wow, what a man!

Ajith is seen as the other superstar-in-waiting; and he has proclaimed this himself. However, he has had too many failures in the past, which have cast serious doubts on his credentials to fill thalaivar’s shoes. I can think of only three of his movies in the past four years which I liked – Attagaasam, Varalaaru and Kreedam. Though he has an excellent fan base, Ajith’s successes at the box office are suspect. I think Billa 2007 will change that, and probably place him a few notches above Vijay.

Surya, though, has never resorted to chest-beating a la his contemporaries. Rather, he seems to have been content with concentrating on his acting, which has done him good. Kaakha Kaakha, a universal favorite, ranks among the best two cop movies ever in Tamil (the other being Kurudhi Punal). And the variety in roles that he has essayed puts to shame the filmographies of both Ajith and Vijay, both of whom are only now waking up to the fact that they cannot survive playing the same roles over and over again, the differences being the leading lady, the number of people they kill and the producer who went bankrupt.

That is not to say that Surya can be all-conquering. He is yet to prove himself in a full-length comedy (Mayavi was a decent attempt; Mounam Pesiyadhae was good, but it came before Surya was a star). And he has to find a way to weave in some humour into his roles, which are all pretty serious. And evolve as a mass hero, without compromising on his strong points.

Tough ask, but Surya combines an excellent physique, good looks and far better histrionics than his rivals. Which makes him a deserving candidate to be the next SUPERSTAR!

Dec 092007
 

Watching the Boro v/s Arsenal game. Half-time now, and Boro have been pretty impressive. In fact, for a while, their combination play has looked like Arsenal’s. Tuncay and Downing have been excellent. And the Gunners have been uncharacteristically poor.

Update: Boro hold off for a win. Deservedly so.

 

… especially, simple South Indian vegetarian cooking has to be among the easiest things to do; so algorithm-like, that there simply can be no excuse whatsoever for someone to be a bad cook.

P.S.: I must confess though that the spinach curry didn’t taste very good.

 

CNN IBN reports that the Supreme Court of India has allowed women to ply the bartending profession. Shocking!

The “discerning reader” would be quick to label this writer as a male-chauvinist and someone mired in old, stupid ideas that stereotype the role of men and women in society. Welcome to the club!

As someone who looks down on drinking, I do not know what the fine art of bartending is all about. Maybe women have a special skill that men lack when it comes to mixing whisky, soda and water. So I commend the Supreme Court’s decision as it is based on the relative abilities of the two genders.

But then, all of us know / have read that while women, wine and willingness make an excellent combination, when the latter turns negative, the results are unpalatable. If people driving under the influence of alcohol are a danger to society, then so are they when next to a woman.

The usual feminist argument is “So I should not pursue what I like the most because I cannot trust a swine?” or “Men will always be men.” Yes, I agree. And from the next time, do not lock your house.

Reminds me of an episode of Kadavul paadhi, Mirugam paadhi from Vijay TV, where they analyze the movie Manmadhan.

Mirugam: “Indha padathula Mandira Bedi, Yana Gupta ellaam super-a, thathroopam-a nadichirukkaanga!”

Kadavul: “Dey, Chendu. Avangala ellaam paththi appadi pesa koodaathu; avanga ellaam kalyaanam aanavanga…”

Mirugam: “Kalyaanam aanavanga naa, veetla purushanukku pongal kindi kudukka sollu… adha vittuttu ippdi ellaam nadichaa…”

 

Roger Cohen writes an excellent article in the IHT, drawing eight rules of modern, global politics drawn from the supposed problems between Venezuela and the United States. I have tried to compare the rules and their applicability in the Indian, mostly Tamilian context.

  1. Trade trumps politics. Wrong! Well, mostly. In India, politics trumps everything. Only inaction trumps politics. A thousand examples are readily available. Like Mamata Banerjee’s mockery of a fast-unto-death when even the Communist Party decided that West Bengal was in need of some economic reform. Or the collective inaction of the central and state governments on the Sethusamudram issue.
  2. Globalization breeds nationalism. In our case, globalization has bred regionalism. Because the southern states have been the major beneficiaries of a boom IT and related services sector, there has been a considerable movement of people to the South. This causes lots of friction. You only need to read arguments posted on the bulletin boards in IT companies to reach this conclusion. Regional parties, evidently angered by what they see as a lowering of the “otherwise lofty” standards of morality in the South, take to various forms of protests. The drive against the pubs in Chennai, and the demolition of KFC outlets in Bangalore are examples. Globalization has also bred something else – the nauseating perpetration of Tamil as spoken on TV, rather than thamizh.
  3. Oil centralizes power. Not directly relevant. But in India, dynasties centralize power.
  4. Anti-U.S. networks are here to stay. Again, not directly relevant. But if you think of the Communists as some kind of pseudo-anti-US networks, then the sad fact is they are here to stay.
  5. Ideologies are now served à la carte. Absolutely! In his response to an earlier post about how Vaiko went back to form an alliance with Jayalalithaa for a few extra seats and some crores, even after the latter had incarcerated him using some flimsy provision in the POTA, Gokul points out that in the state which championed the self-respect movement, the scions of that movement hardly display any self-respect when it comes to forging poll alliances. Ideologies only exist to fill up party websites. It is power that matters.
  6. Democracy is devalued. The Communist Party fights the Congress party in Kerala and West Bengal, and serves it a huge beating most of the time. Elections in these states are tense affairs, and partymen bay for each other’s blood. Yet, these parties come together each time at the Centre, and they know this will be the case even before they clash in the polls at the state-level. And that is to say nothing of Lalu Prasad Yadav’s gun-toting henchmen.
  7. Utopias live. Hope. Why else would people vote diametrically opposite in subsequent elections? Or give a government a bad beating, and give another party an absolute majority, even when they sort of know that nothing will get done. Hope. That the country would be a superpower in 2020. Good luck.
  8. TV trumps all. In spewing one-sided party agenda, truly yes.

 

Today I chanced to watch the movie Azhagiya Thamizhmagan. I was surprised that I found myself liking it, when everyone who had spoken to me about this movie had trashed it. Even more surprising because I didn’t like the songs very much, yet basically everyone trashed my music review.

The movie reminds me of MGR’s Ninaithadhai Mudippavan, where MGR’s one role is as an honest man, and the other role is not, and they play cat and mouse. As the movie wore on, it had elements from another old movie – I don’t remember the name, but Karthik is the hero, and he essays two roles, both of whom are interested in the heroine, Sulakshana.

Vatsan correctly points out that the movie is 80s masala-ish. If it were Rajni playing the lead, it would definitely have been more enjoyable. However, given that and all its logical fallacies, I still liked it. (Of course, if you start accepting that a double act is indeed possible, then any subsequent logical fallacy shouldn’t put you off very much.)

What I hated about the movie is the last couple of minutes.

The bad guy, using his uruva otrumai to the good guy, impersonates him, convinces his parents, the heroine, all his friends that he is the real thing. He also gets physically intimate with an oversized Namitha on a one-night stand, before desiring the same with Shreya.

But then, when the director runs out of ideas how to finish him off, and it is already 170 minutes into the movie, he will let the heroine, fighting for her life in a hospital bed, utter some totally uncalled for tokenist dialogue about virginity, and suddenly our man is reformed!

For many decades, orphanhood was the curse of Tamil cinema. In the first hour, you’ll find the hero, a multi-billionaire with diverse business interests rejoicing with his friends, and romancing with his love interest(s). Then someone will reveal that he is an anaadhai, and he will feel gutted. And voila, he will reform himself suddenly – of course, those two second-half duets in the Swiss Alps notwithstanding. Now, karpu has taken that role. Long live!

 

The first snow shower of this winter in the Northeast.

img_1462.JPG

img_1460.JPG

img_1461.JPG

 

I’m looking for the name of an actor in S.Ve. Shekar’s Natakhapriya. He has a distinct voice, and features in almost all of S.Ve. Shekar’s pre-2000 dramas. Generally he plays a cameo, but very memorable ones.

Some of his most enjoyable roles are as S.Ve. Shekar’s father in Crazy Thieves in Palavakkam (“Maargazhi thingal…”), and as R.K. sir in Kaatula Mazhai. The best of course is as S.Ve.S’s grandfather in Periya Thambi, where he reels out “graamathu pazhamozhis”. Remember “thengaa parichu thenju pona dhevaaram, maangaa parikkayila…” “enna Commissioner Rajagopal aaytaara?”

If you know his real name, do let me know. Thanks.

© 2011 VKpedia Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha